Metal Roofing vs Shingles Which Is Better for Your South MS Home
- Trey Gervais
- 3 days ago
- 3 min read
Choosing the right roofing material is a major decision for homeowners in South Mississippi. With the region’s coastal weather challenges, including hurricanes and high winds, your roof needs to stand strong while fitting your budget and style. Metal roofing and shingles are the two most popular options, but which one offers the best value, durability, and protection for homes in Gulfport, Bay St. Louis, Picayune, and surrounding areas? This post compares metal roofing and shingles side-by-side to help you decide.

Side-by-Side Comparison of Metal Roofing and Shingles
| Feature | Metal Roofing | Asphalt Shingles |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|
| Upfront Cost | $15,000 to $25,000+ (whole roof) | $5,000 to $10,000 (whole roof) |
| Lifespan | 40 to 70 years | 15 to 30 years |
| Wind Resistance | Rated for 140 mph or higher | Rated for up to 110 mph |
| Energy Efficiency | Reflects heat, lowers cooling costs | Absorbs heat, less energy efficient |
| Maintenance | Low, occasional inspections | Moderate, may need repairs or replacement |
| Weight | Lightweight, less stress on structure | Heavier, adds more load |
| Appearance Options| Variety of colors and styles | Wide range of colors and textures |
This table highlights key differences that affect cost, durability, and performance in South Mississippi’s climate.
Best Roofing for Coastal vs Inland South Mississippi
Coastal areas like Gulfport and Bay St. Louis face stronger storms and higher wind speeds. Metal roofing’s superior wind resistance rating of 140 mph or more makes it the best choice for these locations. Its ability to withstand hurricane-force winds and resist water infiltration protects homes better during severe weather.
Inland areas such as Picayune experience less intense wind but still benefit from durable roofing. Asphalt shingles remain popular here due to their lower upfront cost and good performance in moderate weather. However, metal roofing still offers longer lifespan and energy savings that may justify the investment.
Understanding Cost: Upfront vs Lifetime Value
Metal roofing costs more initially, with prices typically between $15,000 and $25,000 for a full installation on an average South MS home. Asphalt shingles cost less upfront, around $5,000 to $10,000. But metal roofs last much longer — often 40 to 70 years — compared to shingles, which usually need replacement after 15 to 30 years.
When you factor in the cost of replacing shingles every 15-20 years, metal roofing can offer better lifetime value. Metal roofs also reduce energy bills by reflecting sunlight, which lowers cooling costs during hot Mississippi summers.
Wind Resistance Ratings Matter in South Mississippi
The Gulf Coast is vulnerable to hurricanes and tropical storms. Building codes and insurance companies recognize this risk by rating roofing materials for wind resistance.
Metal roofing typically carries wind ratings of 140 mph or higher, meeting or exceeding hurricane standards.
Asphalt shingles usually have wind ratings up to 110 mph, which may not be sufficient for the strongest storms.
Choosing metal roofing can reduce the risk of damage and insurance claims after hurricanes, providing peace of mind for coastal homeowners.

Photo Examples from South Mississippi Projects
In Gulfport, several coastal homes have upgraded to metal roofing to improve storm resilience. These roofs show clean lines, modern colors, and strong performance even after hurricanes. Bay St. Louis homes with asphalt shingles often require repairs after storms, highlighting the durability gap.
Final Thoughts on Choosing Your Roof
Metal roofing offers unmatched durability, wind resistance, and energy efficiency for South Mississippi homes, especially along the coast. While the upfront cost is higher, the long lifespan and lower maintenance make it a smart investment for homeowners planning to stay in their homes for decades.
Asphalt shingles remain a budget-friendly option with good aesthetics and easier installation. They work well inland where wind risks are lower but may require replacement sooner.




Comments